It’s probably a combination of Pioneer and the cheap media. The only Ritek disc that shows I may even check the Memorex in the BenQ also. Even the doesn’t burn them as well so I guess having this many optical drives in here pays off once and a while. Just becuase they can do 52x doesn’t mean they get good results, and of course it depends on the burner too if you have a few around to try. Is blank capacity the same as start time? What firmware does your drive have?
|Date Added:||9 August 2014|
|File Size:||38.91 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Anyway, here’s the info mejorex the Memorex CD-R: I tried burning them at that speed and the results depending on the burner were fair to bad so I dropped them down to 24x with my H22n LG and they burn great at that speed, flat, low jitter and low errors all around.
Whatever cdf firmware and the program think it’s best at is the rates you get unless you want to play with the burn speeds in hacked FW and I doubt many are doing that with CDRW burners anymore. If your as picky as me do some test burns in your favorite burners at various speeds and test them and you’ll quickly find out what speed and burner do best together.
Sometime I’ll have to dig out one of my old liteOn CDRW drives that does 52x and see how it does and what speed it likes for the disks. Will it burn at 40x with other programs? Even the doesn’t burn them as well so I guess having this many optical drives in here pays off once and cer while.
Memorex 52X discs burning speed : Recordable Media Discussion
I’ll be posting the results the same way as I did for the CD burners earlier. According to this PDF, it should work at 40x with 1. Doesn’t Winamp have its own CD burner installed, but maybe that won’t work for memirex data files?
Anyone know why these discs would only burn memoeex a maximum speed of 32X in Nero on my Pioneer burner in my sig? The will also burn them at 48x and it’s FW is ancient now. The disk are Moser Baer mid 97m17s06f So it’s Verbatim CD-R media that you tried? Maybe I should just move my BenQ DVD burner over to this computer and be done with it, but then the older computer would be without a burner I haven’t heard that any of the ones I made so far don’t play but I doubt they have used all of them yet.
Is blank capacity the same as start time?
If the player is picky the disk of the worst burners might skip at the end or just not load quickly or read at all but like I said most new gear should read any of the disks my burners made, even at 48x but I try to give out the best quality disks I can so I tend to be pretty anal about how good the disks test out before I send em along.
Where does memorez show it works with 40X in that pdf?
How would these errors you are seeing manifest themselves in meemorex or music or video files? Could it be that the firmware updates on some older DVD burners didn’t cover the Verbatim media you were using? Memorex 52X discs burning speed Pioneer has always been bad about supporting non-Japanese media. Return to Recordable Media Discussion. It’s probably a combination of Pioneer and the cheap media.
What firmware does jemorex drive have? The only Ritek disc that shows Just becuase they can do 52x doesn’t mean they get good results, and of course it depends on the burner too if you have a few around to try.
Memorex 52x Cd-r Media – Walmart.com
I did pop one in my office computer with the same version of Nero and InfoTool comes up showing 52X as a supported speed on my Lite-On burner at work.
I may even check the Memorex in the BenQ also.
I’m guessing Imgburn wouldn’t work for that though.